> > From: Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 991119 Klaus Weide wrote: > >>PW> a good point, provided it is documented somewhere, > >>PW> but it isn't: not in Users Guide or Supported URLs. > >KW> let the inventor of LYNXCFG: do it... :) > PW>yes, if we all accept that authors of features & their modifications > PW>should be required to document them (allowing for language difficulties), > PW>but i hesitate to ask TD to take on the task of doing the requiring. > > Tom, I won't hesitate to at least _ask_ your opinion - what do you > think about the idea that before a new or changed feature is accepted > requiring the contributor also provide documentation? given that it would be a radical change in policy, I don't think it would work out. > Larry W. Virden <URL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
