> > > + * *** This is for those -- e.g. DOS users -- who do not have configure; > > > + * *** others should use the configure switch --enable-lynxcgi-links . > > > + * > > > * UNIX: > > > * ===== > > > * CGI script support. Defining LYNXCGI_LINKS allows you to use the > > i prefer the more explicit version i offered: do you want another patch? > if you disagree, what do others think? People really should use one or the other. If you use the configure script, then there shouldn't be a need to even look at userdefs.h let alone edit it. __Henry
- lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Larry W. Virden
