> > > he implies that all files in /tmp are automatically insecure. > > > > If you mean "(this solution not for the first time brings several > > security problems, but probably is quite convenient)", that looks just > > like completely generic speculation & general theory. On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Natasha Live wrote: > To combat the /tmp prob would there be any chance of a ~/.lynx directory > instead? (by default that is. I know how to set everything manually to do > this in the lynxrc) What remaining /tmp problem *is* there to combat? I mean in the case of lynx, not generic speculation & general theory, not just an "automatic /tmp is bad" reflex that seems to make the rounds. Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing prot... Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing prot... T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoo... Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing prot... T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoo... Natasha Live
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing prot... T.E.Dickey
