> But for now it looks to me that neither links nor w3m is up to the
> task.. one of them, I forget which, doesn't even do cookies.
> Neither do SSL. One does frames the same goofy (no offense) way
> Lynx does. In some cases, both look MUCH better than Lynx. Oh
> yeah, neither of the others even has bookmark file support, as far
> as my admittedly limited looking around could find. (There's no
> documentation for links, so it's hard to say definitively).
Actually w3m does support cookies, SSL, and bookmarks. It's
quite a nifty program, and development seems swift...
> So I use Lynx most of the time, and play with the others. It's nice to
> have some competition though.
I keep hearing about "competition", but to me Lynx
and w3m complement each other very nicely. If a page
doesn't look good in Lynx I'll simply go back and
press "." to call w3m. I'll either keep using w3m
(which has a pretty good Lynx keyboard emulation),
or simply quit back into Lynx. People who have
decided to choose one or the other are clearly
limiting their options and/or don't fully
understand the capabilities of these browsers.
Cheers!
_________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gunnm: Broken Angel
http://128.100.80.13/marco/main.html
