>* Changed EXP_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT logic so that input characters that are > unrepresentable in the current display character set (unless it is UTF-8) > get transformed into '?' instead of some accidentally chosen 8-bit > character. "some accidentally chosen 8-bit character" is a much better choice than "?". At least different chars are shown with different glyphs. And you will not mixup these unrecognized chars with a "true" "?". Why not show them as ?234 which an appropriate highlight (here 234 is the octal code of the input byte)? Ilya
- lynx-dev dev.15 patch 1 Klaus Weide
- lynx-dev dev.16 patch 1 Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev dev.16 patch 1 Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev dev.15 patch 1 ilya
- Re: lynx-dev dev.15 patch 1 mattack
- lynx-dev EXP_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT change (was: dev.15 p... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.16 patch 1 Leonid Pauzner
- lynx-dev dev.16 patch 1b (partial mode for TRST table) Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev dev.16 patch 1b (partial mode for TRS... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.16 patch 1b (partial mode for... Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev dev.16 patch 1b (partial mode... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.15 patch 1 T.E.Dickey
