On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Klaus Weide writes:
> > [*] Except for some code in the devel code that doesn't work properly
> > afaik.
>
> The original base64 code worked fine, but no-one supports the
> Content-Transfer-Encoding header that the RFC recommends should be used.
Well, if it used "quoted-printable" instead of "base64" it would work
in more situations. If it used a C-T-E only when necessary (8-bit chars
present), it would work in more situations.
> The newer raw-byte version does work, but only in some situations.
Newer, or older? It seems at some point there already was a non-encoding
version, which got replaced by the unconditional base64 code. But I
haven't followed closely.
> Handling multipart/form-data in ASP files isn't fun. At all.
And there I thought that kind of stuff was there to make it *simpler*...
Klaus
