> Henry, we say hanKaku not hanGaku.
Right. Amazed you could read it (only because my sendmail has qkc as a
frontend). BTW, were you able to read the final "na" of "katakana?"
> Anyway you mean Shift_JIS is wrong because it has code for half width
> katakana? I guess you think EUC-JP is also wrong by same reason.
No. The ambiguous *WAY* Shift_JIS encodes it. Anyway, since you can
program in c, make Lynx a better guesser. If you really think Shift_JIS
is worth something, help Klaus fix the search code, or assure him it is
working correctly for all code sets. Thank you.
__Henry
