On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> >
> > > __Henry:
> > > > > I also am very much opposed to allowing the Visited Page posting (writing
> > > > > to disk) privileges.
> > >
> > > Vlad:
> > > > I see this as useless feature too (but I'd like to be able to have much more
> > > > bookmark files than 26, so I won't have to invent one-letter association for
> > > > bookmark files. Having implemented ability for adding (and probably
> > > > deleting) links to/from arbitrary files will allow user to save favorite links
> > > > from his/her session to some file - IMO 95% of links in the V.L. page would be
> > > > useless for user, and will allow nice aid for thorough categorization of
> > > > links).
> > >
> > > What are you talking about? What does the Visited Links Page have
> > > to do with bookmarks?
> >
> > I started talking about extended bookmark support (even more extended than
> > present in current versions of lynx) because I think that user don't need
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > entire VLP to be saved, ability to have arbitrary number of bookmark files
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> No-one was talking about that in this thread, AFAIK.
Then what is Henry very much was opposed to (1st sentence in this letter)?
> > could allow the user to save only selected links to some bookmark file
> > (in case categories of all 26 other bookmark files don't match ones the user
> > wishes to). Probably that was offtopic (or subject of the message should be
> > changed).
>
> Highly confusing.
>
> Klaus
>
Best regards,
-Vlad
