On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> Sorry that it looked complicated. When I see the expression, it tells
> me to do exactly what you did. Is there a simpler way of expressing
> it?
Well, I think
0.9999 * 0.9998 * ... * 0.9981
looks simpler than
9999! / (9980! * 10E76).
The second expression is of course equivalent to the first. It's less
ambiguous (doesn't require the reader to fill in the `...'). It's
just that, when *I* see the second one, it doesn't immediately tell me
what to do.
No big deal...
Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - UI Pa... T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - UI Pa... T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - ... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, ra... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - UI Pa... T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - UI Pa... T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - UI Pa... T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - UI Pa... Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Options, V.Links, random (was: patch 6 - UI Pa... T.E.Dickey
