4-Dec-00 23:28 Vlad Harchev wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Klaus Weide wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Vlad Harchev wrote:
>>
>> > I'm removing HTMLSRC_* stuff (hiding all setting with names begining
>> > HTMLSRC_blah
>> > under a one, with subscription by the blah, case of blah doesn't matter). What
>> > should be the name of that setting? I suggest PSRCSPEC.
>> > (Ie, new way to say "HTMLSRC_comment:b:!b" will PSRCSPEC:comment:b:!b).
>> >
>> > Any suggestions?
>>
>> Why not just
>>
>> PRETTYSRC:comment:b:!b ?
>>
>> Or
>> PSRC:comment:b:!b? .
>>
>> Klaus
>>
> I already sent patch with PSRCSPEC name chosen. Seems that PRETTYSRC and PSRC
> are equally uninformative, while PSRCSPEC tells that it's some specification
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
we have -prettysrc command line so the same name in lynx.cfg looks
nearly the best choice. (And if your patch working in general it would
not be a problem to change the name later).
> (not simply the value). But I don't insist on PSRCSPEC.
> Best regards,
> -Vlad
