> Mayvbe we could work around the apparent problem with some changes in 
> the lynx code, but I don't think that would solve your real problem. 
  
not necessarily: it is possible that his problem is due to header that
declare the types identically (some compilers simply don't accept that).
  
-- in any case, we need more information...
  
>     Klaus 
>  


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey

Reply via email to