On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 09:19:57AM +0000, David Woolley wrote:
> ...
> Also of concern is the fact that Lynx-SSL is quoted as being the FreeBSD
> ports tree. I haven't followed this up, but they may be in violation of
> the GPL here.
Don't see how the FreeBSD ports tree is of concern to Lynx developers.
They have a makefile that combines code from Lynx and the ssl patch,
just they way one would do it manually. I have a link to the FreeBSD
ports page on the Lynx current distribution page, and there are links
to the ssl patches in the faq-o-matic.
Lynx distribution directory:
http://www.slcc.edu/lynx/current/index.html
Ports for lynx: includes Japanese and ssl flavours
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/www.html
FreeBSD Ports download script:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/pds.cgi?ports/www/lynx-ssl
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports/www/lynx-ssl/pkg/DESCR
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports/www/lynx-ssl/pkg/DESCR
------
<http://www.cs.indiana.edu/picons/db/users/us/md/lib/bcpl/jspath/face.xbm>
<http://www.altavista.com/cgi-bin/query?q=%22web+home+for+jim+spath%22>
Marvin the Paranoid Android says:
Alright what do you want me to do? Let's get it over with.
