On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Klaus Peter Wegge wrote:
> > binutils 2.91 is recommended, but no precompiled binary package is
> Why is it recommended?
I think it has to do with better alignment, but I am out of my depth
here. See the discussions about binutils 2.91 on the djgpp and
djgpp-workers mailing lists.
> I have found a binary version at http://www.goof.com/pcg/data/djgpp
> but is rather old (1998).
That wasn't compiled with DJGPP 2.03. I wouldn't recommend mixing
versions.
> Searching at DJGPP home page for the sources and your patch delivered
> no results. Can you provide me please with some more details or
> directly with sources and the patch?
The patch is at:
"http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/1999/08/24/15:14:36"
> I just started on openssl intergration for DJGPP lynx. But it seems
> to be rather difficult. I'll continue work and tell you more about
> the works progress.
Thanks. I'll be interested.
Doug
__
Doug Kaufman
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
