On 2000-03-31 (Today) at 14:06 -0600, Klaus Weide typed:
| On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Frederic L. W. Meunier wrote:
| > | I suppose you mean s/FALSE/TRUE/g ? (Watch the double negatives.)
| > | It would be unusual if they denied access if a referer header _is_
| > | sent. Is that actually the case?
| >
| > No, they only 'deny' with FALSE, but don't show any message,
| > just load the same page you were when you submitted the data.
| > Those sites could at least show why you're getting errors with
| > NO_REFERER_HEADER:FALSE. The whois at NetworkSolutions is fine.
|
| That just doesn't make sense - they *want* a referer header.
| Expected:
| NO_REFERER_HEADER:FALSE - Lynx sends Referer - site 'works'
| NO_REFERER_HEADER:TRUE - Lynx doesn't send Referer - site misbehaves
| You are saying:
| NO_REFERER_HEADER:FALSE - ??? - site misbehaves
| NO_REFERER_HEADER:TRUE - ??? - site 'works'?
|
| I get the expected behavior with <http://registro.br/>, not what
| you claim. Has NO_REFERER_HEADER been broken since the code I am
| using (which isn't the latest)? Can you fill in the '???' (look
| at trace)?
My apologies! I should read what I send at least twice. Of
course they only deny with TRUE. I forgot the 'NO' part. It's
not broken (2.8.3.dev23) :)
--
Fr�d�ric L. W. Meunier [Tel: +55-21-620-7173 - Niter�i-RJ Brasil]
fredlwm@{olympiquedemarseille.org,{marseille.}nitnet.com.br}
