3-Apr-2000 17:12 T.E.Dickey wrote:
>> 2-Apr-2000 16:26 Leonid Pauzner wrote:
>> >> not really. send a patch - but bear in mind that it can lead to the same
>> >> sort of problems as did my cleanup of getbkgd().
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Thomas E. Dickey
>>
>> > Well, I made a patch
>>
>> Here a resync for pre.2 (windows makefiles now changed safely):
> looks better (though since there's still some 'NCURSES' definitions in effect
> for PDCurses, it's not 100% correct - will see).
It is 100% equivalent to the current behaviour,
whether this is right or not - another question.
> --
> Thomas E. Dickey
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
