On Thu, 20 Apr 100, T.E.Dickey wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Apr 100, T.E.Dickey wrote:
> >
> > > > * Initial support for SOURCE_CACHE_FOR_ABORTED was added.
> ^^^^^^^ (it's a part of something, doesn't indicate - to me, anyway -
> what it's solving, and probably will prolong the release,
> which is overdue: I was really only waiting for the revisions
> on the Options Menu, or for problems building, etc).
Seems the implementation is trivial - there shouldn't be any bugs (just look
at it - if it compiles, then it wont' fail), and default value matches current
behaviour of pre3. But I'm not pushing anything - you always have last word.
> > >
> > > that sounds like post-2.8.3
> >
> > Tom, what do you mean?
> >
Best regards,
-Vlad
