> I can think of no reason why Lynx documentation should be written against
> the deprecated Transitional DTD.  At least from the documents linked from

Thanks; I was hoping you'd comment.

> lynx.browser.org, the only thing that really locks the documentation into
> HTML 3.0 is the TAB, physical markup, element that never made it into
                  ^^^
Probably was never in the spirit of HTML, but I sure like to have my tabs.
I was sorry to see it go.  (Still can do: "<pre>        </pre>", I guess?)

__Henry

Reply via email to