> In other words, it really isn't a great leap of intuition to have > lynx text pages that are several screens wide, and scrolling > consists of something like CTRL-left and CTRL-right, with printing CTRL-left and right might work on a local PC compatible keyboard. They are meaningless for most real terminals. The real reason that horizontal scrolling has been rejected is that it is painful when used with real terminal over dialup lines, because it takes a significant amount of time to paint the scrolled version of the screen. I'd also expect it to cause problems with people using screen readers. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- lynx-dev Tables (once again) and virtual lynx pages vtailor
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) and virtual lynx pa... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) and virtual lyn... Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) and virtual... Duncan Simpson
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) and vir... Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) an... Robert A Hopkins
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again... Duncan Simpson
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) and vir... mattack
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) an... pAb-032871
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again... pAb-032871
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) and virtual lyn... Robert A Hopkins
- Re: lynx-dev Tables (once again) and virtual... Yotam Gingold
