> > Sometimes it is more kind to teach someone "how" and "why" than to > do it for them. While this is true, it is usually not a commercially viable approach! Personally I think users of "free" software should pay for it in terms of learning to use it properly, but there is a strong move towards treating it like commercial software but without any money changing hands, or changing hands for "media" and documentation "only". ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect ... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
