From: Henry Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 20:32:55 +0900 (JST) > We all used them, from Lynx2.3, more than 5 years ago. For you to tell > me that Lynx is/was not one of the forerunners of CJK support is a total > mind blower. Sorry but who said such that Lynx is/was not one of the forerunners of CJK support? If I think so I do not maintain a wrapper style package. I only requested that please merge some feature of a wrapper into source code if possible. Regards, 2000.5.25 -- Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Tokushima Univ. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG pAb-032871
- lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should... Michael Warner
