>>>>> Klaus Weide writes:
Klaus> On 12 Jun 2000, Sergei Pokrovsky wrote:
...
Klaus> Hmm, and since you are using slang, you may want to
Klaus> experiment with the '-blink' flag to lynx.
I observe that everything becomes bold. Not bad, but in fact that is
not very good, because my bold face is a bit less rich than the meager
one (e.g. it lacks quantifiers, logical connectors etc).
But this gives me an idea: by inverting the convention and defining
COLOR:0:gray:white
COLOR:4:black:white
I obtain the bold face for the main text, and the meager face for the
emphasized (and my math happens to be emphasized). That gives a
better way to distinguish among emphasis (by the heaviness, and that
in a non-unusual way, as italics often are lighter than the plain
face), and the anchors (which are distinguished with the color).
Klaus> And see what happens after you "LYNXCFG://reload". (Just
Klaus> trying to make sure that your inexhaustible source won't dry
Klaus> up soon...)
I do not see anything special. OK, your idea really was a source of
innocent merriment, but probably in a different way than you
expected.
>> - emphasis is sometimes rendered with the color only (which I'd
>> prefer), or is combined with underline (which I'd rather turn
>> off, but don't know how to do it).
Klaus> lynx -nocolor suppresses that.
Probably you mean -nounderline
Klaus> (cont'd in another message)
Yes, see there about the horrible effects of your imprudent
misadvice ...
--
Sergei
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
