On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 05:06:58PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a recent note, Doug Kaufman said: > > > Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 07:55:38 -0700 (PDT) > > > > This seems like a rash statement. Why do you think that interest or > > support for these protocols are dwindling? Omen technologies version > > of zmodem is still available and being updated. The free version, > > lrzsz continues development. Kermit is still very active, with a > > recent new release and a lively usenet group. > > > Maybe I just attach too much weight that most of my peers snicker > when I mention kermit. there's a difference between 'peers' and 'associates'. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- lynx-dev local download over telnet Saad Alghuwainem
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet pg
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Matt Ackeret
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet pg
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev local download over telnet Doug Kaufman
