001127 Doug Kaufman wrote:
> No one has commented on my question from 29 October 2000
> in regard to restrictions on distribution of SSL-enabled lynx.
> Now that the RSA patent has expired and US export regulations have eased,
> does anyone see problems with licensing conflicts, etc.
> if I were to distribute a binary of SSL-enabled lynx for DOS
> (compiled without idea or rc5, using openssl)?
i got the latest Mutt 1.2.5i for my new Linux system
& it contains SSL as a basic capability,
so maybe we should be thinking of incorporating SSL
in all the regular Lynx distributions.
have a look at www.mutt.org/ .
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
