On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:34:42PM -0800, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> I finally compiled and tested dev.14 in regard to the recent changes
> in SHOW_KB_RATE, which added the NONE option and allowed control of
> the ETA display. There appear to be two problems. The first is that
> many of the changes were made #ifdef EXP_READPROGRESS, which made
> control of expression of KB rate nonfunctional if EXP_READPROGRESS was
> not defined. It had functioned before the recent change. The other
> problem is that it appears to be implemented backwards. TRUE or KB
> leads to showing bytes, while FALSE or BYTES leads to showing KB. I
> have made some changes which I think restore the intent. I have not
> compiled with EXP_READPROGRESS, however, so I have not been able to
> check those functions, but they seem to be OK. Please let me know if
> these changes are not what was intended.
thanks (will see - this looks like the right direction). I'm working
on xterm right now (deadline tomorrow), have a short patch for vile,
then expect to work on dev.15 for 2-3 days. Much of November went to
(besides starting to set up a new development machine) to packaging
stuff (including dev.14) for the VMS freeware cdrom (done).
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
