010103 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:47:24AM -0800, Matt Ackeret wrote:
>> I'm not trying to dissuade anybody from improving lynx,
>> but at least one of the majorly requested features is already in links.
> sure - the tables look ok in the other two programs,
> but (links in particular) navigation is poor.
> Code quality isn't worth mentioning
> (see the 0.05 code/comment ratio, which basically says its not commented)
i haven't tried Links or W3M, as i find Lynx excellent for most purposes,
not least its navigating power; for images, download to a file,
then goto another desktop (Linux + KDE) & look at them with xv ;
for tables, there's Tom Zerucha's script, which works very well:
you list it under printers, send it the source & it outputs a file of tables.
the big, big problem is JS, which is taking over like creeping ivy:
at least, couldn't we get Lynx to extract URLs from JS & show them as links?
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
