FAQ # 10,121.  (Just about everybody.)

> I don't know java script well enough to answer this, but I see examples of
> javascript calls that are basically rewrites of html links, and I think
> there may be a limited subset of javascript that is html in disguise and
> could cover enough cases to make its inclusion in lynx a very good idea.

Rather than stuff more "limited subset" garbage into Lynx, why not write
a Lynx-friendly proxy routine?

__Henry

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to