On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Rob Cameron wrote:
> It would also seem that every CAN_ANONYMOUS.. variable in userdefs.h
> should be inspected here (or elsewhere) in order that the
> configurations specified in userdefs.h take effect. I can't
> figure out how that happens.
that's a slightly different matter - the effect of my change is that a lot
of inline assignments are done in a table to make it easier to modify, but
there shouldn't be (aside from bugs) any difference in behavior or how
userdefs.h is used. I didn't add any CAN_xxx symbols (but having them
in a table does make it easier to see which restrictions had none).
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
