On Wed, 30 May 2001, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> anyway - the original question: I last updated it for dev18 - I generally
> do remember to update lynx.pot when adding a message, but don't think it's
> necessary to regenerate it to reflect the line numbers in the current
> source.
Yes, line numbers are not that important. But we should try to make sure
all messages are available within any released .pot file. This time 11
messages were missing ;)
> I've a to-do item on my (shrinking) pre-release list to regenerate
> this, but haven't done that yet, since (to make the line numbers right), it'll
> be the last change I make.
Great! Ideally, a command like 'make dist' should try to make sure to
regenarete lynx.pot.
[Sorry for the noise I made.]
Karl
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
