On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Henry Nelson wrote:
> > P.S. I see no reason for existence of a dumbed-down style-less lynx.
>
> I see no reason for the existence of a smarted-up styled lynx. Why?
> Because the so-called "lss" is a misnomer and doesn't even come close to
> support for CSS. It just means more configuration for a modicum of
Lss is not meant to be a mean for supporting css (provided by site author).
It's just a mean to arbitrary and precisely color various html tags
(independantly of the URL the html came from).
> fanciness, which I don't need or want. As it is, the Lynx community cannot
> even come to a consensus on what the default seven colors ought to be.
> I shudder at the thought of what lss.cfg would throw at me. Weeks of lost
> time trying to get the screen back to "normal."
I think that time will worth it - pretty screen is something useful.
Best regards,
-Vlad
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
