On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:06:45PM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> I have read the replies already posted, but none of this makes any
> sense to me. If I understand properly, you claim that the changing
> byte numbers at the bottom of the lynx screen take up most of your 24
> kbps bandwidth when you are just connected by telnet or direct modem
> connection to a linux machine running lynx. This seems impossible. It
> wouldn't even take up most of the bandwidth on a 2400 bps connection.
Perhaps an improper term{cap,lib} is forcing lynx to redraw the entire page
each time the spinner is updated. I just did a script of a download of a
file that's of 58M. The typescript file was 11K. If I trim out all the
non-spinner stuff, it's 4K.
Perhaps if the Pat ran lynx under script, and obtained some numbers there,
we could attack the issue from that view point.
Because, if it IS a bad term{cap,lib} setting, I would expect a performance
issue with more than just lynx.
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
