On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Rob Partington wrote: >Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 16:10:43 +0000 >From: Rob Partington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support? > >In message <E16iHSx-00022m-00@harland>, >Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I had intended to start working on it with an older version of >> Lynx late last year between contract gigs. A new gig came up and >> I have not had the time to get back into it. I am willing to >> start on it again. Help is welcome. There doesn't seem to be >> much interest in JS support as far as I can tell, however. > >Look for my messages on the topic in the archives. I've already done >a fair amount of work on this and, in my humble opinion, it's pointless >without a total rewrite of Lynx's internals. If you're going to do that, >though, you might as well start from a more sensible starting position >like w3m or gecko.
or links? links already does some pages "prettier" than w3m. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
