> >> An example I can think of is wellsfargo.com. They only support IE (and > > > >Use another bank, or use another browser. If people want what Mozilla > >does, then they ought to use Mozilla. It does not benefit Lynx to falsely > >identify itself. > > Get real.
What, there's no other bank out there than WFB? If you wish to discuss security at WFB, I would be happy to take the discussion off list. I may be able to open your eyes to some pretty scary things going on there, though not concerning e-banking in the sense of using a web site. If you have your entire nestegg with them, I sincerely recommend that you begin the process of spreading it out among one or two other banks. > It benefits *ME*. I am the user, I have the say. You misunderstand. (I hope.) I thought we were talking about the _default_ User-Agent id string. You are not the only user by any means. I don't think it is fair to ask everyone to use a lynx which misrepresents it's capabilities. Each individual user has the privilege of easily changing the User-Agent Header that is sent by visiting the O)ptions page. If you wish to change it permanently to something that suits you, that can be done at compile time. (This is most certainly valid, particularly if you have modified the source code.) Sorry, but my vote stands against changing the User-Agent id string that the source code ships with. __Henry ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
