> Henry Nelson: > In other words, Lynx's native support of "mailto:"; URLs is too clumsy?
yes, it is. it's usable, though. i miss header-editing the most. mutt presents me with a complete RFC-822 text in my favourite editor, where i can do with the headers whatever i want. then comes an empty line so the mailer knows that the body begins, and the body itself. i like that. could the reason for lynx' mailer doing headers extra be error handling? for a novice i can see the advantage. -- clemens fischer ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
