> RobertM: > > But wouldn't it be FAR FASTER to simply > > have assigned, say, x to some position in > > foo.txt, and then via some super-quick-to-do > > command, eg ":gx", and you're there! > > > > JUST LIKE THAT! > > > > Unless everyone finds this idea completely > > worthless, please add it to some (official) > > "to-do" list. > > Errm, isn't that sort of what bookmarks are for? > Though of course they don't provide for random anchors but. > > Also how would that work on a remote document over which you have no > control. > e.g. u assign X to the 57th line of some document , then when you > neext visit that document via your buffr thingy it's only got 40 > lines?
so be it! many documents aren't static anymore, though, that's where i see the biggest problem. i would love bookmarks and often wished i had them, but basically this could only work if those bookmarks pointed into the cash-buffer. i can see bookmarks only as regular-expressions like ctags makes them. -- clemens fischer ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
