On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 01:03:35AM +0100, RobertM wrote: > > it consistent, all of those would be settable from the configure script, > > since the obvious way to implement the configure script's checks for available > > options would be to use the "CAN_ANONYMOUS_" names defined in userdefs.h. > > For myself I don't much mind if it's scripted, alonglist of > "CAN_ANONYMOUS_" or a LYNX_RESTRICTIONs thing, whichever's easiest to > do really.
The former would be simpler, since I wouldn't have to maintain two separate mechanisms. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
