On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Ian Collier wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:45:54AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > But it is: It works for ncurses. (I did make a minor in ncurses 20010602 > > to make ncurses do the right thing - one of the changelog entries mentions > > that). As I noted, a comparable change probably could be made for slang, > > which is what Redhat uses. (Redhat's ncurses rpms are newer than that > > change). > > Hmmm... > > $ ldd /usr/bin/lynx > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x40027000) > libncurses.so.5 => /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x40036000) > libssl.so.2 => /lib/libssl.so.2 (0x40074000) > libcrypto.so.2 => /lib/libcrypto.so.2 (0x400a1000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40167000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4028e000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > $ rpm -q lynx > lynx-2.8.4-18 > $ rpm -q ncurses > ncurses-5.2-26 > > It still repaints just after executing xli but before xli prints its messages.
It's hard to recall what version of ncurses Redhat is putting in an rpm. The patch date is printed as part of the "tic -V" message for instance. (I'll revisit this, this evening - right now I'm not on a platform where I can check my memory). -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
