> is this still the case? if so, at least one such country should be named;
The USA used to be the country from which you couldn't export it, although I think the situation is now that there is conditional permission - you need to register it with the US authorities. Actually, the US is a country from which you cannot export it, with respect to countries like Iraq, and about half a dozen others. US citizens trying to export need to take reasonable measures to ensure that the people to whom they distribute do not re-distribute to those countries. France used to be the Western country where you couldn't use encryption; I'm not sure of the current situation. However, it is likely that there are a dozen or more countries where encryption by citizens is strictly controlled. They tend to be countries where this sort of information is not advertised strongly to the West, and where it might even be considered subversive for citizens to communicate the existence of such laws, as that might be considered challenging their existence. That sort of country, if they have any signicant military developments, is also likely to ban the export of encryption technology. > if not, the last two lines should be dropped. I would say it was unsafe to drop this warning, even though it may be difficult to get positive information. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
