3-Dec-2002 14:29 I wrote: > 2-Dec-2002 00:24 Bela Lubkin wrote: >> http://www.armory.com/cache/userinfo-t.html
>> performance of an old Lynx 2.8.4dev.20 binary vs. today's 2.8.5dev.11. >> I also compared output, verifying that they were in fact identical. >> The results show that Leonid grossly underestimated the benefits of his >> changes: >> File 2.8.4dev.20 2.8.5dev.11 >> -dump -dump >> -dump -nolist -dump -nolist >> userinfo450.html 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 >> userinfo450-t.html 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.10 >> userinfo3600.html 4.95 2.50 0.48 0.42 >> userinfo3600-t.html 5.30 4.56 0.54 2.50 >> userinfo7200.html 28.24 10.54 0.93 0.83 >> userinfo7200-t.html 27.93 20.25 1.08 10.29 >> Oddly, `lynx -dump -nolist` is now slower than `lynx -dump` in some >> cases... > Still cannot figure why -nolist is slower, but you help me fix > one more quadratic behaviour issue: > userinfoNNN-t.html is a huge table with lots of anchors. ... Apparently, lynx with -nolist option on the above test file shows STbl (visualy improved simple tables) which eats CPU, while without the flag tables are collapsed for some reason - try "links are numbered" in the Options menu for such presentation. Not sure whether this is a bug or just the table happens to be too wide in this case. Leonid. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
