5-Jun-2003 13:42 Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > More remarks from Leonid, answered together:
> A) If the document is in HText cache, the expiration date is ignored. > This is not what I observe. Very often documents get reloaded > even with my cache-100-documents settings. > Will try to record the URL when I see this the next time... Try. > C) no-cache is equivalent to timeout=now. > Do not think so; see time-skew above... > Moreover, documents supplying no-cache are "differently > broken", so it may make sense to treat them differently than > documents with short expiration time. Yes, it may make sense. But currently lynx treats "expires<=now is equivalent to no_cache", and "ignore expires value otherwise". Try grep "expires" *.c > D) purging on receiving the HEAD is blah blah blah (could not follow > it completely). > Sorry, what I meant was the "header-part" of the document, one > finished by the first "\r\n\r\n" (if I got this correct). > When we receive the header, it should be a good indication > that the server is going to deliver the document - at least > not worse than it did the last time ;-). Perhaps... And what if we got "500 Server error" responce, supplied with a nice "please contact a webmaster" page? What about non http:// schemes? Any other ideas? > This answers the question about 'z', right? > E) We cannot fix major bugs now, when we are close to release. > We are still in development branch. Hurry!!! ;-) Do not hurry. And as we see, the problem is not the implementation details, but the design decisions. We need an agreement on lynx-dev first. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
