On Wed, 28 May 2003, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:16:24PM -0400, Chuck Martin wrote:
> >
> > A thought just occured to me. Perhaps it was https:// instead of
> > http:// where I was seeing this problem. Is that what you're saying
> > here? And if so, is there a reason why the source cache isn't used
> > for https://?
>
> probably because it was overlooked.
Isn't there a security problem with caching secure files? I would hope
that we wouldn't do that unless we could assure that the cached item was
as secure as when viewing the original file.
Doug
--
Doug Kaufman
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
