031231 Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> it's high time there was a release called '2.8.5'. > yes -
good! > I originally had it in mind a year ago, > but couldn't clean up for a release & deal with LP's patches. > That's why I switched my process to incremental patches in June - > to get rid of distractions. Unfortunately that core dump in textarea > has my attention since it's a new bug and is difficult to debug. >> with many projects, the difference between '2.8.4' & '2.8.5' >> wb the same as between present Lynxes '2.8.4.16' & '2.8.4.17'. > agreed - if I don't get distracted by something else, > I'll complete dev.17 during this week. as i'm sure you realise, my point is re version-numbering, not your careful & conscientious work on Lynx. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
