On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Henry Nelson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:38:12PM -0200, Fr�d�ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > > (My own view is that non-subscribers shouldn't be allowed to > > > post, but the last time we argued this I was in the [very > > > small] minority.) > > > > Why ? I'll moderate it. But I don't like the idea of moderating > > what goes to the actual lynx-dev, so better get rid of it and > > do "2" - > [...] > > "2- Send back a message about the move. Their original message > > could be included, just in case they don't save a copy." > > Since you are the one doing it; whatever you setup is fine [by me anyway]. > > I didn't understand what you meant by "actual lynx-dev". Did you mean > the "present lynx-dev" list, i.e., what we are using now at sig.net?
Yes. > Or will you be employing some kind of secondary, filtered > list which is open to anyone that you monitor, in addition to > the "actual" lynx-dev list which is not monitored, but > automatically filtered and closed to subscribers only? The actual, present, current, or whatever lynx-dev will be closed once we move it. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
