040220 Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> 040220 Doug Kaufman wrote: >>> It was thought best to leave the spam, rather than break the links. >> no-one in their right mind is going to go back to an archive full of spam, >> esp when there are >= 3 alternatives easily available (see FM's list). > What he meant is that there are various links in the documentation > (that can be replaced IF the move happens) > and e-mails pointing to such messages.
so you change the dox & any refs inside the archived msgs. it s~b too difficult to devise scripts to do enough of the work. >> if that is the best Flora & its advisors can come up w , >> the best course is simply to close the whole operation down. > Yes, after 2 years it's time to say goodbye > and thanks for all the fish (and spam). yes really, it's like you go visit an ageing friend & find his place is full of cockroaches: you bid him a hasty farewell. perhaps you first offer a bit of advice re cleaning things up, but when he doesn't seem interested, you waste no more time on him. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
