[Search replace patch] > It certainly will not be included into 1.0.x. I agree that we should move on to 1.1. However, since it will be long before 1.2 appears, I think it's sane to allow a few features to go into 1.0.1. In particular, I think it's ok to put this replace patch into 1.0.1. Before 1.0.0, we said that the patch would go in 1.0.1. I don't see why we should change this policy now. After all, we want Daniel on the team. On March 1st, we declare the 1.0.x line dead with the release of 1.0.1. But it's not dead before that. (If 1.0.1 turns out to be buggy, that's just too bad. So Daniel, please make sure that the patch is very correct. Don't rely on other people testing it.) This is IMO, but of course Lgb has the final say. Greets, Asger
- Patch: regex for find+replace Daniel Naber
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Daniel Naber
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replac... Daniel Naber
- Re: Patch: regex for find+r... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Patch: regex for fi... Daniel Naber
- Re: Patch: regex fo... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replac... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replac... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Joacim Persson
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Daniel Naber
- Re: Patch: regex for find+replace Jean-Marc Lasgouttes