On 2 Dec 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | ---- proto lyxml fragment
> | <section title="Definitions and Examples">
> | <theorem type="Definition">
> | A
> | <emph>category</emph>
> | <inset><math><mathcal>C</mathcal></math></inset>
> | is:
> | <itemize>
> | <item>a collection of <emph>objects</emph>,
> | <inset><math>\ob <mathcal>C</mathcal></inset>
> | </item>
> | <item>a collection of <emph>morphisms</emph>,
> | </item>
> | -----
>
> Actaully this is the direction I want the LyX format to envolve. And a
> lot of that is quite easy to do right now. If you look at the previous
> devel branch I began doing some fo this, but I used more latex like
> constructs, but that is not really important.
Excellent :-). Eventually, it would be nice if LyX became completely
LaTeX-independent (so LaTex was just a back-end, and that's all) but for
now we're going to need a way for users to input direct LaTeX from time to
time.
>
> Note however that we need to support some hardcoding of spacing and
> the like:
>
> <section>
> <section-parameters>
> ...
> </section-paramters>
> ...
> </section>
>
Surely it's better to say
<section paramx="frog" wibble="foo"...>
...
</section>
> I think we should try to begin taking LyX in this direction, _but_ we
> have more pressing tasks.
Fair enough :-)
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
