On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 02:21:11PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On 22 Dec 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > And this is why it takes lyx two hours to compile on the new stdlib++,
> > 1 hour of that time is lyxfunc...
> >
> > reducing function size will speed up compilation time a lot.
>
> So you'd like to ditch the giant switch statement and replace it with a
> function table instead? A vector indexed by function number or a hash_map
> perhaps? This is easy enough to implement.
>
> Actually, didn't Amir suggest something wonderful using a bunch of
> separate functions last year? Where we could include the function pointer
> and it's arguements in the undo/redo stack? Hmmm... I'll have to check my
> archive.
Me?! I know you're in a different time zone, but I can't imagine it's Friday
there already. Why would I suggest something about the core C++ code?
Or did you mean the other Amir?
-Amir
