Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> I definitely do not want to release a version of lyx which is unusable >>> by a large portion of our user base. > > Am I right, that this is your main argument? > When we could be sure that everywhere is a Qt4 installation > then you would drop qt3 immediately? > > So we could support 1.4 until Qt4 is standard on most machines. > That should not be too hard for the qt3-only users because at > the beginning 1.5 doesn't have very much additionally to 1.4 > (unicode and ?)
Oh, I see, you've already said 'No' to this idea: > I definitely do not want to release a version of lyx which is unusable > by a large portion of our user base. If we are qt4 only, we have to do > what is needed to get people to use it. There is no free lunch, as was > said earlier. > > So I vote No to "people should stick with 1.4 if they are unhappy" argument. > > JMarc -- Peter Kümmel
