>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> For command sequences, as a heuristic, the sequence is declared >> enabled if the first action is enabled. This is not correct, but I >> do not have a better idea. Angus> Why don't you loop over all commands in the sequence and Angus> establish if any actions are disabled? There are no if-blocks Angus> to complicate the logic. Because action 2 may not be possible until action 1 has been done (for example, action 1 opens a math inset and action 2 is a math-only operation). JMarc
