Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Yes, but perhaps we should add a way to insert any unicode codepoint and/or sequences. Both numerical and perhaps also textual.
unicode-insert #ffff #0302 unicode-inserr non-visible-char combining-latin-acute
Good idea. Would be nice to be able to do soill enable us to also bolt on a dialog to enable these things to be composed.
something like this would superseed the accent lfuns imo.
But it doesn't negate his opinion that we still need an inset to hold multiple code points that can be represented as a single grapheme/glyph. Or do I miss something?
Incidentally, that's "supercede". Angus
