On 10/2/06, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> A trivial (looking) patch to correct inset behavior, which is broken
> with revision 15068. Without this patch, it is not possible to modify
> an existing inset. All modifications processed as new index. (see
> lyxfunc.C:1420)
Congratulations Ugras, I think the fix is correct.
Beginner's Luck :)
thanks..
> I will be glad if somebody review the attached patch (and submit to
> svn if it is correct )
Abdel, please do that if you agree, since svn blames you for the '0'. I
noticed the compiler warning about the unused variable "inset", but was too
lazy to look at it.
Conclusion: Listen to your compiler and do not add code with "expected"
warnings.
Georg
